36 Compare and also Contrast Traditional and Activity-Based Costing Systems

Calculating an exact manufacturing price for every product is a an essential piece of info for a that company decision-making. For example, learning the cost to develop a unit that product affects no only how a organization budgets come manufacture that product, but it is regularly the starting point in identify the sales price.

You are watching: In traditional costing systems overhead is generally applied based on

An crucial component in identify the total production expenses of a product or job is the suitable allocation the overhead. For some companies, the frequently less-complicated traditional technique does an excellent job of allocating overhead. However, for many products, the allocation of overhead is a more facility issue, and an activity-based costing (ABC) device is much more appropriate.

Another element to consider in identify which that the two major overhead allocation approaches to usage is the cost connected with collecting and assessing information. Once making their decision regarding which an approach to use, the firm must take into consideration these costs, both in time and money. (Figure) compares overhead in the 2 systems. In plenty of cases, the ABC method is more expensive in terms of time and other costs.

The difference between the traditional technique (using one price driver) and also the ABC method (using multiple price drivers) is more complicated than simply the variety of cost drivers. When straight labor is a huge portion that the product cost, the overhead expenses tend to it is in consistently driven by one expense driver, which is typically direct job or machine hours; the traditional technique appropriately allocates those costs. When modern technology is a large portion that the product cost, the overhead expenses tend to be driven by multiple drivers, so utilizing multiple expense drivers in the ABC technique allows for a much more precise allocation of overhead.

See more: Robr I Wanna Fly Can You Take Me Far Away 1 Hour Loop Wings, I Wanna Fly

Overhead in timeless versus abc Costing TraditionalABC
Overhead assignedSingle cost driverMultiple cost drivers
Optimal usageWhen direct labor is a huge portion the the product costWhen an innovation is a big portion of the product cost
OrientationCost drivenProcess driven

As displayed with Musicality’s products, not only are there different costs for every product when comparing classic allocation v an activity-based costing, however ABC confirmed that the Solo product creates a loss because that the company. Activity-based costing is a much more accurate method, because it assigns overhead based on the activities that drive the overhead costs. It can be concluded, then, the the cost and subsequent gross loss for each unit’s sales carry out a an ext accurate snapshot than the in its entirety cost and also gross benefit under the timeless method. (Figure) to compare the expense per unit making use of the different expense systems and shows how various the prices can be relying on the technique used.

*

How much overhead would be allocated to each unit under the timeless allocation method?How lot overhead would certainly be allocated to each unit under activity-based costing?

(Figure)Carlton’s Kitchens provides two types of pasta makers: Strands and Shapes. The agency expects come manufacture 70,000 systems of Strands, which has a per-unit direct material expense of $10 and also a per-unit direct labor price of $60. It also expects come manufacture 30,000 systems of Shapes, which has actually a per-unit material cost of $15 and a per-unit direct labor cost of $40. The is estimated that Strands will use 140,000 machine hours and also Shapes will need 60,000 machine hours. Historically, the company has offered the traditional allocation method and applied overhead at a rate of $21 per an equipment hour. That was figured out that there were three expense pools, and the overhead for each expense pool is shown:

*

What is the per-unit expense for every product under the classic allocation method?What is the per-unit price for each product under alphabet costing?Compared to alphabet costing, to be each product’s overhead under- or overapplied?How lot was overhead under- or overapplied for each product?

(Figure)Carlton’s Kitchen’s three price pools and also overhead approximates are as follows:

*

The approximated overhead because that the material price pool is estimated as $12,500, and also the calculation for the an equipment setup pool is $35,000. Calculate the allocation rate per unit the brass and per unit of yellow using:

The classic allocation methodThe activity-based costing method

(Figure)Portable Seats makes two chairs: folding and also wooden. This info was derived to review the decision to consider ABC:

*

How much overhead would be assigned to each unit under the traditional allocation method?How much overhead would be assigned to every unit under activity-based costing?

(Figure)Casey’s Kitchens renders two species of food smokers: Gas and also Electric. The agency expects come manufacture 20,000 devices of Gas smokers, which have actually a per-unit direct material price of $15 and also a per-unit direct labor expense of $25. It additionally expects come manufacture 50,000 devices of electrical smokers, which have actually a per-unit material price of $20 and also a per-unit straight labor expense of $45. Historically, it has actually used the classic allocation method and used overhead at a price of $125 per maker hour. The was identified that there were three cost pools, and the overhead for each cost pool is as follows:

*

What is the per-unit price for each product under the traditional allocation method?What is the per-unit cost for every product under alphabet costing?

(Figure)Casey’s Kitchens’ three cost pools and also overhead estimates are as follows:

*

The approximated overhead for the material expense pool is approximated as $45,000, and also the estimate for the maker setup swimming pool is $55,000. Calculate the allocation rate per unit that silver and per unit of gold using:

The classic allocation methodThe activity-based costing method

(Figure)Portable Seats makes two chairs: folding and wooden. This information was derived to testimonial the decision to take into consideration ABC:

*

Compute the overhead assigned to each product under:

The timeless allocation methodThe activity-based costing method

(Figure)Cape ko Adventures provides foam noodles through sales that 3,000,000 units per year and also retractable watercraft oars through sales that 50,000 pairs every year. What details would Cape cod Adventures require in order to readjust from classic to abc costing? What are the constraints to activity-based costing?