Best Bench: 88% Base clock 4.3 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)Worst Bench: 71% Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)


You are watching: Ryzen 7 1700x vs ryzen 7 2700x



*

Best Bench: 81% Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)Worst Bench: 65% Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)


05 Nov20|TechpowerupAMD Ryzen 5 5600X Review8 %FarC5 12%, BFV 11%, SotTR 4%, Rage2 1%, Witcher3 0%, Civ6 11%, ACO 4%, MetroEx 8%, Sekiro 15%, Wolf2 9%
28 May20|TechpowerupIntel Core i5-10400F Recheck out - Six ...8 %FarC5 12%, BFV 11%, SotTR 4%, Rage2 1%, Witcher3 0%, Civ6 11%, ACO 4%, MetroEx 8%, Sekiro 15%, Wolf2 9%

MemoryAvg. Memory Latency79.2 PtsSlightly reduced memory latency.+8% 73 Pts
1-CoreAvg. Single Core Mixed Speed117 PtsFaster single-core speed.+12% 104 Pts
2-CoreAvg. Dual Core Mixed Speed230 PtsFaster dual-core speed.+12% 205 Pts
4-CoreAvg. Quad Core Mixed Speed448 PtsFaster quad-core rate.+12% 401 Pts
8-CoreAvg. Octa Core Mixed Speed815 PtsFaster octa-core rate.+11% 736 Pts

MemoryOC Memory Latency88.5 PtsSlightly reduced OC memory latency.+9% 80.9 Pts
1-CoreOC Single Core Mixed Speed124 PtsFaster OC single-core rate.+11% 112 Pts
2-CoreOC Dual Core Mixed Speed245 PtsSlightly quicker OC dual-core speed.+9% 225 Pts
4-CoreOC Quad Core Mixed Speed486 PtsSlightly much faster OC quad-core speed.+9% 446 Pts
8-CoreOC Octa Core Mixed Speed936 PtsSlightly faster OC octa-core speed.+10% 854 Pts

Market ShareMarket Share (trailing 30 days)1.16 %Hugely better industry share.+544% 0.18 %
ValueValue For Money81.2 %Better worth.+18% 68.8 %
User RatingUBM User Rating70 %70 %
PricePrice (score)$280Cheaper.+22% $360

AgeNewest40 MonthsMore current.+26% 54 Months
TDPThermal Design Power (TDP)105 Watts95 WattsSlightly even more power effective.+10%
Coresoccupychristmas.org Processing Cores8 cores8 cores
Threadsoccupychristmas.org Processing Threads16 threads16 threads
LithographyManufacturing process12 nmNewer manufacturing.+14% 14 nm
Base ClockBase Clock Speed3.7 GHzSlightly much faster base frequency.+9% 3.4 GHz
Turbo ClockTurbo Clock Speed4.3 GHzFaster turbo frequency.+13% 3.8 GHz
64-CoreOC Multi Core Mixed Speed1364 PtsSlightly faster OC 64-core rate.+7% 1274 Pts
64-CoreAvg. Multi Core Mixed Speed1251 PtsFaster 64-core rate.+10% 1137 Pts



See more: Ti N Tiny Wedding Pictures, We'Re Getting An Inside Look Into T

The 8 core, 16 thread 2700X is AMD’s second generation Ryzen 7 flagship following in the wake of the Ryzen 7 1800X which proceeds to sell excellent multi-core value for money. This new Pinnacle Ridge processor functions the Zen+ architecture with 12nm lithography compared to 14nm previously. Whilst there is no increase in the number of cores, the stock base / boost clocks appear to have received a bump as much as 3.7 / 4.3 GHz from 3.6 / 4.0 GHz. The 2700X is compatible with both the new 400 series and also 300 series of motherboards. Early benchmarks show that the 2700X has a slightly better effective speed than the 1800X, although further benchmarks are crucial to quantify this. The supposed launch price of $329 has a Wraith Prism cooler and also is in the exact same price bracket as the 1800X and also Intel’s Coffee Lake i7-8700K. Whilst the 6 core, 12 thcheck out 8700K beats the 2700X in single and also quad core performance by about 15%, the 2700X wins on multi-core workloads. PC gaming and also desktop performance is primarily governed by six or less cores but the 2700X offers value for money to workterminal users. Even though the 2700X excels at video production, streamers need to look in other places. Streaming through dedicated hardware such as NVENC or a sepaprice stream PC will virtually always lead to fewer dropped frames. 

MORE DETAILS

The AMD Ryzen 7 1700X isn"t due for release until next week yet two of our customers have actually already submitted benchmarks. Comparing the quad and also single core scores from our samples reflects a loved one 4.3% rise on the single core score so it’s possible that turbo wasn’t totally involved (12% turbo boost expected). These preliminary outcomes are seriously superior as they put Zen’s IPC in between 0% and 9% below Intel’s Kaby Lake. Even in the worst situation scenario these results are still exceptional. Comparing Intel’s $1,000 6900K and also the 1700X reflects that AMD delivers comparable performance for half the price! A shake-up of the occupychristmas.org industry will unfold as Zen rolls out. If Ryzen occupychristmas.orgs have the right to overclock to 4.6+ GHz they will certainly most likely overcome the whole industry putting a very welcome finish to the monotonous tick-tock of recent years.